Sales/Use Tax Traps in a Merger

Recently a client asked us to comment on their proposed merger plans. Mergers are always happening, so I thought it would be worth your while for us to comment on this to our friends and clients at large.

The basic facts were that, for various reasons, our client planned to simplify their corporate structure. The old structure consisted of a number of limited partnerships, limited liability companies, corporations and even a US branch of a foreign corporation. They planned to get down to just a few legal entities in the US by contributing member interests in the LLCs and merging several corporations out of existence. The question for us to comment on revolved around what would be the sales/use tax impact of such a transaction.

What Did The Mayan Calendar Say About State Taxes in 2012?

There's no indication that Nostradamus or the Mayans predicted anything state tax wise for 2009 , but we can make predictions based on how the economy is going.

Trouble in CA

We all know that California is in deep fiscal trouble. Back in July, 2009, CA was unable to meet its bills for the second time this year and the state started issuing IOUs. In fact, as reported by CNNMoney.com at the time, some 28,750 IOUs worth $53.3 million were to have been issued initially, mainly for personal income tax refunds. CNN said this at the time: "The state's fiscal condition is disastrous. Officials passed a budget in February, but declining tax revenues have opened up a $26 billion deficit."

California is in trouble, no doubt. But according to a study by the Pew Center on the States, so are 9 other states. It's interesting to look at what states are named and to consider what impact this will have on state taxes.

9 Other States in Trouble

"Window of Opportunity" (Amnesty) Announced in Louisiana

It seems like these amnesties come up a lot, but in reality they don't. For example, Louisiana hasn't had an amnesty program since 2001. If you have activity in Louisiana and possible sales/use tax or income tax exposure, consider taking advantage of this opportunity. 

In fact, Louisiana is calling their amnesty program a "Window of Opportunity".  It applies to all taxes administered by the LA DOR (except motor fuel taxes). It applies to taxes that became due as of July 1, 2001, and before Jan. 1 of this year (money owed since the last tax amnesty program); taxes due prior to Jan. 1 for which the agency has issued a notice or demand for payment between July 1, 2001, and May 31 of this year; and taxes due as of July 1, 2001.

The benefits are that the DOR will waive 50% of the interest due and 100% of the penalties.

Go to this link for more details or contact us for specific questions.

So What States Have Active Amnesties in Place?

I thought it would be good to give a rundown of which states are offering amnesty programs right now and give some details from CCH on each of the programs. Many of these expire in June. Arizona's expires on June 1. Better hurry! Some of them have significant caveats associated so let the tax manager beware.

Here's the list (click on the link for additional details):

MA -- Expires 6/30/09

MD -- Expires 10/30/09

CT -- Expires 6/25/09

NJ -- Expires 6/15/09

AZ -- Expires 6/1/09

Are You an Offensive Linemen or a Quarterback?

How Do You Measure Performance?

When we talk to tax professionals in corporate America about metrics they use in measuring performance, the number of the various types of tax returns they file is usually high on the list of measurables. They usually talk about the number of people in the tax department and how they have it staffed in terms of the level of specialization. This is completely understandable. Tax people have a huge job. All these returns have to get in on time and accurately or penalties and interest is the result.

What the Texas Legislature Hath Wrought

What the Texas Legislature Hath Wrought

We have been saying all along that we thought that Texas legislators didn't really understand what they were voting for when they enacted this new "margin tax" in Texas. Texas has alway been "business friendly". It's a major factor businesses consider when deciding to relocate to this fair state. But the special committee headed by John Sharp that conceived of this tax apparently suffered from California envy. Now Texas has the most onerous corporate income tax in the Union. The legislators who voted for this thing are already hearing it from the Taxpaxers and you can bet the noise will get louder and louder. The Comptroller's Office is charged with implementing this stinker and they seem to making a huge effort to educate the public. The office of Texas Comptroller is an elected position. How would you like to be the Comptroller responsible for implementing the worst tax ever passed by the State of Texas? Susan Combs is just the messenger, but she's getting an earful. She could turn into a hero, if she becomes the public champion of the "Let's Repeal this Tax" committee. Then the legislature would be under a huge amount of pressure. We'll see how this all develops.

Major Defeat Dealt to States Seeking to Apportion Income Using the "Operational Function Test"

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a very interesting ruling affirming its earlier decisions related to the taxation of "unitary businesses".  (See MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Illinois Department of Revenue, U.S. Supreme Court, Dkt. 06-1413, vacating the Illinois Appellate Court, April 15, 2008).

In this case, Mead had sold Lexis-Nexis for a $1Billion gain. That gain was allocated to Ohio by Mead. Illinois audited them and took the position that the gain should have been apportioned to IL. IL made the argument at the trial court (which agreed with the State) that although the businesses weren't unitary, the asset (Lexis-Nexis) was used in an "operational function", it should be apportioned. This "operational function" concept has arisen in a couple of recent US Supreme decisions. It has apparently given the states the idea that there is no such thing as allocable income anymore because all they have to do is argue that the asset involved was used in an operation function and they can apportion it. Of course, only the extraterritorial states want to make this argument. But the Supremes in this case, say the IL court erred in their interpretation of this test. See below for their commentary: